تحلیل فرایند فردیت‌یابیِ نوروز در منظومۀ‌ «گل و نوروز» بر اساس نظریۀ تفرّد یونگ

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکترای زبان و ادبیات فارسی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تبریز

2 دانشیار زبان و ادبیات فارسی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تبریز

3 استادیار زبان و ادبیات فارسی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تبریز

10.22111/jllr.2020.5283

چکیده

  فرایند فردیت از دیدگاه یونگ نوعی پختگی و رشد روانی انسان است که در طی آن مرکز شخصیت از «من» به «خود» منتقل می­شود و از آن جایی که آثار ادبی به دلیل غنای درونی و نشأت گرفته از ناخودآگاه جمعی،در کالبد انباشته از سمبل­ها و استعاره­ها،ساختارهای خودآگاه و ناخودآگاه، خواننده را در خود درگیر می­سازد و خواه و ناخواه تحلیل کهن الگویی متن ادبی را می­طلبد. در این مقاله سعی شده است منظومه­­ی «گل و نوروز» خواجوی کرمانی به روش توصیفی- تحلیلی بر اساس نظریۀ تفرّد یونگ مورد نقد و بررسی قرار گیرد.سفر نوروز به سوی روم که در واقع نمادی از جست­وجوی وی در روند فردیت روانی است و با اولین تکانۀ عشق به سوی روم شروع می­شود، اساس داستان این منظومه را پی­ریزی می­کند و قهرمان داستان که در آغاز شاهزاده­ای جوان و بی­تجربه بود با فعال شدن کهن­الگوی آنیما و ارسال فراخوانِ پیوستگی و یگانگی به قلمروِ خودآگاه روان قهرمان، روند فردیت­یابی وی آغاز می­شود و با هدایت پیرخردمند، گذر از مشکلات و سایه­های درون و انعطاف­پذیری پرسونا، بین خودآگاه و ناخودآگاه­ وی هماهنگی ایجاد شده و در نهایت فرایند فردیت و خودشناسی را با موفقیت به پایان می­رساند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

1- Analysis of the individuation of Norouz in the verse of “Gol and Norouz” according to the Jung individuation theory

نویسندگان [English]

  • Morteza Balar 1
  • Hamidreza Farzi 2
  • Rostam amaniastmal 3
1 PhD student of Persian Language and Literature Dept, Islamic Azad University,Tabriz branch.
2 Associate Professor of Persian Language and Literature Dept, Islamic Azad University,Tabriz branch.
3 Assistant professor of Persian Language and Literature Dept, Islamic Azad University,Tabriz branch.
چکیده [English]

     The process of individuation from the perspective of Jung is a kind of sophistication and mental development of man which the center of personality is transferred from “ego” to “self” and since literary works, due to the inherent richness and rooted in the collective unconscious include symbols and metaphors, conscious and unconscious structures and involve the reader and require a literary text archetypal analysis. This poem written by Khajuei Kermani was analyzed by descriptive and analytical method based on Jung Individuation Theory. His journey to Rome is in fact a symbol of his quest for the process of psychic individuation begins by the first impulses of love that makes the foundation of the poem and the protagonist is a young and inexperienced princess in the beginning and begins individuation the activation of anima and recalling continuity and unity to the realm of the conscious mind of the hero and by guidance of old wise man and solving problems and eliminating inner shadows and flexibility of persona, he achieves coordination between his consciousness and unconsciousness and finally, the individuation process and self-knowledge is ended successfully.
 
 
1-     Introduction
The collective unconscious manifestation centered on the myths, stories and literary creations led to a branch of criticism which is one of the most important and most used methods of contemporary literary criticism that examines the nature and characteristics of the archetypes and their role in literature. From the perspective of the archetypical criticism, myths are basically the structure of literature that make possible the verbal communication of narration and meaning.
The concept of collectivist sub- consciousness and its two related concepts, archetype and individuation are important Jung psychology. One is important in terms of its role in the development of personality and the other in terms of reversing its themes in artistic creation and dreams ( Yavari, 2009:102-104). Thus, the recognition of this layer from the unconscious in the process of self-knowledge and individuation, which is one of the fundamental concepts in Jung’s psychology, is of particular importance. Jung believes that there is a close relationship among the art, literature, dreams and myths and art and literature as dreams are the place of manifestation of imaginations and the emergence of a collective subconscious. He believes that great poets like Ferdowsi, Hafez, Molana and Hedayat are eternal since their works reflect the collective subconscious manifestations and the common mythological insights (Shayeganfar, 2012: 251). Consequently, literary works, due to the inherent richness and rooted in the collective unconscious include symbols and metaphors, conscious and unconscious structures and involve the reader and require a literary text archetypal analysis. Given the importance and application of the individuation process in explaining the epic stories and especially the protagonists of the story, the present research tries to investigate 1- the roles and effects of each archetype in the process of individuation effective in the identity of “Nowruz” and 2-according to this fact that the protagonist of this story is compatible with Jung Individuation Theory, it is necessary to adapt this theory in order to investigate this personality from a new perspective in the scope of the mentioned theory.
 
2-     Research methodology
The present study was conducted based on descriptive analytical method. For this purpose, firstly, theoretical fundamentals of research with relying on library resources and Jung’s opinions about the process of individuality were categorized and then with an analytical approach, the symbolic journey of the hero of the story to achieve self-awareness and during the process of individuality have been addressed.
 
3-     Discussion
One of the most basic theories of Jung is that the trend and direction of growth in personality is towards unity and stability and to achieve this goal, all psychological systems must separate and evolve into their components; in other words, all the different systems of character like the Anima (Anima), Shadow, Persona and etc. allow the occurrence, division and evolution of the balance between the consciousness and the subconscious mind and the person achieves psychological development (Shamlu, 2016:59). The process of individuation in his opinion is a kind of mental growth that the center of personality “ego” (self-awareness) moves toward “self” (inner un-consciousness layer) and this transfer is indeed movement from ego to self and different layers of personality come to recognize and adapt to each other and self-awareness and unconsciousness are coordinated( Jung, 2013:359).
The process of individuation in fact is compromise of the consciousness with inner center that begins usually with the plundering of personality and suffering. Many myths and fairy tales have expressed the initial stage of the process of individuation with the patient or aging of the king or they are the theme of another old story, for example, the king and his wife did not have children or the monsters of women and children and horses destroy the wealth of the kingdom or a giant, without a hurricane, and a tail of sea and land on the king’s army or darkness, drought, flood and cold throughout the country make trouble (Jung, 2013:253).
The story of “Gol and Nowruz” begins with the wish of the king of Khorasan to have a son and the God gives him a son as the result of his prayers and he calls him Nowruz. Since the requirement of process of individuation is a journey to the inner world and the unconscious in order to obtain identity and to reach self-knowledge, Nowruz, the main protagonist begins journey to Rome for self-knowledge and identity that reflects a deep desire for inner change and a new experience. This symbolic journey or the process of individuation, which is the same as the transfer of the center of gravity from I to ego is done with the help of a series of ceremonies such as Anima, Shadow, Persona and old wise man. So that Nowruz, with the first spark of anima achieves psychological balance between self-awareness and the unconscious from the subconscious and with the absorption and analysis of the shadow in self-consciousness and flexibility to coordinate and make compatible the persona in different situations with timely guidance of old wise man.
 
4-     Conclusion
Independence, self-knowledge and identity and non-attachment on the parents are the main theme of the story that is the process of individuation. Nowruz individuation begins with the plundering of his personality and suffering from pain and he goes to the desert with a group of companions and reaches the caravan in the desert. The owner is a man named Kashmir and he is talking to him. After the description of the events of his life speaks about the Roman Caesar and his daughter and exaggerates in the expression of beauty. So with the resurrection of the love in Nowruz soul by the words of Kashmir about “Gol” (flower). The process of achieving perfection and spiritual integration is flourished, because love is the primary motive of this poem and from the archetypal perspective leads to the inner coherence of existence and the body and mind, self-awareness and coordinates the unconscious as it is necessary during the process of fostering identity and existence of Nowruz symbolically to reach self, self-knowledge, travel to inner world and the unconsciousness that begins to journey to Rome for reaching inner anima and through the shadow and flexibility of the mask by guidance of old wise man begin to create a psychological balance between self-consciousness and unconsciousness. After overcoming the forces arising from the collective subconscious and attracting them into self-consciousness, the protagonist expands the domain of self-consciousness and transfer the psychological center from “ego” to “self” and finally by unification of the two opposite sides of the psychic they are merged into the higher proposition and reborn and evolved psychologically.
 
 
References
1-Ālendi, rene. Ešq. Tr. By Jalāl Sattāri. 1th ed. Tehrān: Tūs. (1999/1378 SH).
2-Bīlsker, RīČārd. Andīše-ye Yung. Tr.By Hoseīn Pāīande. 4th ed. Tehrān: Farhag-e Jāvīd. (2012/ 1391 SH).
3-Eliāde mircā. Ostūre-ye Bāzgašt-e Jāvdāne. Tr. By Bahman Sarkārātī. 4th ed. Tehrān: Tahūrī. (2014/ 1393 SH).
4-Fadāei, farid. Yung va Ravānšenāsī-e tahlīlī-e ou. 4th ed. Tehrān: Dānže. (2015/ 1394 SH).
5-Fūrdhām, Frīeda. Moqadameīi bar ravānšenāsī-ye yung. Tr. By: Masūd mīrbahā. . 2th ed. Tehrān: Jāmī. (2014/ 1393 SH).
6-Guerin, Wilfred L. and et. Al. Rāhnama-ye rūīkardhā-ye naqd adabi. Tr. By Zahrā Mīhanxāh. 5th ed. Tehrān: Etelāāt. (2015/ 1394 SH). 
7-Jamzād, elhām. Animā dar šer-e šāmlū. 1th ed. Tehrān: Negah. (2014/1393 SH).
8-Joqatāeī,Sādeq, ansāri pouiā, mohammad.Tahlil-e Kohan olqou-ye Dāstan-e Zāl va Roudābeh. Year 13. No 24. dānešgāh-e sistān va balouchestān: pazhuhesh nāmeh-ye adab-e qenāeī. . (2015/ 1394 SH). 
9-Jung, Carl Gustav. Čahār sūrat-e mesālie. Tr,By Parvin farāmarzi. 1th ed. Mašhad: āstān-e qods-e razavi. (1989/ 1368 SH).
10-Jung, Carl Gustav. Ravānšenāsi-ye zamir-e nāxodāgāh. Tr. by Mohammad ’Ali Amiri. 6th ed. Tehrān: Elmi va Farhangi. (2011/1390 SH).
11-Jung, Carl Gustav. Rouh va zendegi. Tr. By latif sedqiāni. 5th ed. Tehrān: Nāšr-e Jāmi. (2013/ 1392 SH).
12-Jung, Carl Gustav.  Ensān va sambol-hā yaš. Tr. By Mahmoud Soltāni-ye.9th ed. Tehrān: Nāšr-e Jāmi. (2013/1392 SH).
13-Mūrenū, Antoniū. Yung, xodāyān va ensān-e modern (Jung, Gods and modern man).Tr. by Dariūš Mehrjūeī. 8th ed. Tehrān: Markaz. (2014/1393 SH).
14-Šamisā, sīrūs. Dāstan-e iek rūh. 6th ed. Tehrān: ferdos. (2004/ 1383).
15-Šamisā, sīrūs. Naqd-e adabi. 3th ed. Tehrān: mitrā. (2015/ 1394 SH).
16-Šāmlū, Said. Maktab-hā va nazarī-ye hā dar ravānšenasī-ye šaxsīit. 11th ed. Tehrān: Rošd. (2016/ 1395 SH).
17-Šāyeqānfar, Hamid Rezā. Naqd-e adabī. 5th ed .Tehran: horūfiie. (2012/1391 SH).
18-Snūden, Rūt. Xodāmūz-e Yung. Tr. By Nūraddin Rahmāniiān. 5th ed. Tehrān: āšiān. (2011/ 1390 SH).
19-Šūltez, dūān. Olgū-ye Yung (ensān-e fardīit yāfte). Tr. By Gītī Xošdel. Majale-ye āraš. Šomāre-ye 13. (1980/ 1359 SH).
20-Xājou-ye Kermāni, abolatā kamāl alddin mahmoud ebn-e ali ebn-e mahmoud. xamse-ye xājou-ye Kermāni. Ed.By Said Neiāzi-e Kermāni. 1th ed. Kermān: Dānešgah-e Šahid Bāhonar-e Kermān. (1991/ 1370 SH).
21-Yāvari, Hūrā. Ravānkāvi va adabiyāt. 1th ed. Tehrān: soxan. (2008/1387 SH).
 
 
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Jung
  • individuation process
  • archetypes
  • Gol and Norouz masnavi
1-     آلندی، رنه، عشق، ترجمه­ جلال ستاری، چ اول، تهران: توس، 1378.

2-     اسنودن، روت، خودآموز یونگ، ترجمه­ نورالدین رحمانیان، چ 5، تهران: آشیان،1390.

3-     -اقرانی ارگی، آزاده؛ مشهور، پروین دخت، آنیمای معشوق در غزل های عطار بر پایه نقد کهن الگویی یونگ، س 16، ش 30، دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان: پژوهشنامه ادب غنایی،1397.

4-     الیاده، میرچا، اسطوره­ بازگشت جاودانه، ترجمه­ بهمن سرکاراتی، چ 4، تهران: طهوری، 1393.

5-     بیلسکر، ریچارد، اندیشه­ یونگ، ترجمه­ حسین پاینده، چ 3، تهران: فرهنگ جاوید، 1391.

6-     جقتایی، صادق؛ انصاری پویا، محمد، تحلیل کهن الگویی داستان زال و رودابه، س 13، ش 24، دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان: پژوهشنامه ادب غنایی،1394.

7-     جم­زاد، الهام، آنیما در شعر شاملو، چ اول، تهران: نگاه، 1393.

8-     خواجوی کرمانی، ابوالعطا کمال الدین محمود بن علی بن محمود، خمسه­ خواجوی کرمانی، به تصحیح سعید نیازی کرمانی، چ اول، کرمان: دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان، 1370.

9-     شاملو، سعید، مکتب­ها و نظریه­ها در روان­شناسی شخصیت، چ 11، تهران: رشد، 1395.

10- شایگان­فر، حمیدرضا، نقد ادبی، چ 5، تهران: حروفیه، 1391.

11- شمسیا، سیروس، داستان یک روح، چ، 6، تهران: فردوس، 1383.

12- شمیسا، سیروس، نقد ادبی، چ 3، تهران: میترا، 1394.

13- شولتز، دوان، الگوی یونگ(انسان فردیت یافته)، ترجمه­ گیتی خوشدل، آرش، شماره 13، 1359.

14- فدایی، فرید، یونگ و روان­شناسی تحلیلی او، چ 4، تهران: دانژه، 1394.

15- فوردهام، فریدا، مقدمه­ای بر روان­شناسی یونگ، ترجمه­ مسعود میربهاء، چ2، تهران:جامی، 1393.

16- گورین، ویلفرد و دیگران، راهنمای رویکردهای نقد ادبی، ترجمه­ی زهرا میهن­خواه، چ 5، تهران: اطلاعات، 1394.

17- مورنو، آنتونیو، یونگ، خدایان و انسان مدرن، ترجمه­ داریوش مهرجویی، تهران: نشر مرکز، 1393.

18- یاوری، حورا، روانکاوی و ادبیات، چ اول، تهران: سخن، 1387.

19- یونگ، کارل گوستاو، چهار صورت مثالی، ترجمه­ پروین فرامرزی، چ اول، مشهد: آستان قدس رضوی، 1368.

19 --------روان­شناسی ضمیر ناخودآگاه، ترجمه­ محمد علی امیری، چ 6، تهران: علمی و فرهنگی، 1390.

20 -------(الف)،انسان و سمبول­هایش، ترجمه­ محمود سلطانیه، چ9، تهران:جامی، 1392.

21 -------(ب)، روح و زندگی، ترجمه­ لطیف صدقیانی، چ پنجم، تهران: جامی، 1392.