Comparing the Transcendent Future Theory and Khayyam’s Thinking about Death

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor of Persian Language and Literature Dept, Persian Gulf University

2 M. A. Student of Psycholgy Dept, Persian Gulf University

3 Assistant Professor of Psycholgy Dept, Persian Gulf University

10.22111/jllr.2020.5588

Abstract

 

Introduction

   Some similarities are observed between two or more ideas which seem to be chronologically and geographically unrelated to each other. These similarities might rise from the identical roots between different nations. Qualities like life and death, good and evil, justice, cruelty, love, sacrifice, patricide, filicide and etc. are transnational and universal and appear more and less similarly in different nations’ literature. The reason behind these similarities might be found in their oral literature, mythology, myths or subconscious of the nations. The more universal one nations’ thoughts, the more important they become. Among these thoughts, thinking about death has been considered of high importance in Muslim and western intellectuals. Khayyam is the representative of Iranian old theoretical thoughts in whose philosophical quatrains has asked questions about death and its stress and incomprehensible features by using different similes and metaphors. In order to overcome these difficulties he proposed some solutions which violated the religious convictions. This is when he lived in a society whose foundations were based on strong religious beliefs. However, the idea of the transcendent future is related to the modern world which thinks about death in a non-religious way and suggests some solutions as well. Since there was no comprehensive research on the topic, the main objective of this paper is to compare and contrast the visions of Khayyam and western ideologists who think of death as the transcendent future. Thus the research questions are:

What are the transcendent future and thinking about death in Khayyam’s point of view?
How do these two views consider overcoming the stress of death?
How do these two views consider immortality, heaven and hell?
What is the effect of thinking about death on seizing the day?
 

 

Research Methodology

        This paper is a comparative analysis and uses library resources and written texts. Therefore, Zimbardo’s transcendent future theory and Khayyam’s quatrains were analyzed to compare and contrast.
 
 

Discussion

   Khayyam’s thinking about death arises from his personal thoughts and has a materialistic and nihilistic look on death. (Nowruzi, Davoodkhani, 2000,110; Nafisi,2006:23),  While the transcendent future vision believes in the life after death .(Ortuño,., Paixão. & Janeiro, 2013;11). Khayyam’s belief in body and soul and metempsychosis is in line with the transcendent future (Khatat,. Shouhani,2006:59). Nonetheless, the theory of transcendent future is the result of different research and religious beliefs which attempts to present a concept which is acceptable to all religions without considering any specific culture. The other bold concept in the transcendent future view is believing in the life after death as a transcendent feature  (Boyd& Zimbardo 1996:38), whereas Khayyam does not think of death as a transcendent concept which probably is their most obvious difference. However, according to the differences between the meanings of the words, it is not easy to claim that they had similar view of a transcendent concept.
For the stress of death, it needs to be said that since the time is short, both views propose confronting mechanism; for Khayyam they are: having fun, seizing the day and vinosity in order to enjoy more (Rahmdel,2006:139) . In the transcendent future view, these mechanisms are positive attention to suicide, building and positive attention (Boyd, & Zimbardo,2005:191). Positive attention is almost similar to being happy and seizing the day in Khayyam’s view. Since the life after death is meaningless to Khayyam, being happy and enjoying life is to reduce the stress of death up to the point a human being is alive. However, in the view of the transcendent future which believe in the life after death, the focus is on building and creating over time. They believe in this sentence that “I go but my generation continues.”  And it reduces the worries (Urien,2007:369).
Heaven and hell exist in both views. For Khayyam these exist within the human being and they are the center (Ebrahimi Dinani,2011:257). Followers of the transcendent future also believe in the heaven and hell as they will be after death (Van Beek, Karieyz, 2015:82). The concept of immortality also exists in both views. Immortality for Khayyam is worldly; it is to convert into other elements (Kohandani, 2005:80). For the followers of transcendent future, there are five forms of immortality which people will face based on their culture and religion (Hood, Mooris,1983:354).
Both views give high importance to seizing the day and living in the moment; however, since the findings were gathered from older people (Scheibe,Carstensen,2010:137), it cannot be said the youngsters who believe in the transcendent future also think the same of seizing the opportunities.
 
 

Conclusion

Through analyzing and comparing Khayyam’s views which were done only based on his quatrains and the idea of the transcendent future which is a rather modern psychological theory, it can be said that both believe in death. For transcendent future followers, which is a more scientific view on death, dying is not the end and there is life after it while Khayyam think of death as the end of life. In order to escape from the worries of death, he suggest to be happy, drink and live in the moment while transcendent future theorist think of suicide as a solution which can please human beings and help them overcome the stress and fears of death.
Also, while Khayyam sees Heaven and Hell within himself, the vision of a transcendent future believer, unlike him, is believed to be an outer land based on people's future view of them. The concept of immortality is also expressed differently in each perspective; while Khayyam suggests the belief in worldly immortality and the return to the material cycle, the perspective of the transcendent future suggests different forms of symbolic immortality that each individual may tend to one. But perhaps the most similar in the two perspectives is the issue of seizing opportunity. Both visions insist on enjoying the life in the moment; the issue is called hedonism for the transcendent future view.
 
 
References

Boyd, J. N., & Zimbardo, P. G. (1996). Constructing time after death: The transcendental-future time perspective. Time & Society, 6, 35–54.
Boyd, J. N., & Zimbardo, P. G. (1997). Constructing time after death the transcendental-future time perspective. Time & Society6(1), 35-54.
Boyd, J. N., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2005). Time perspective, health, and risk taking. In A.
Carstensen, L. (2006). The infl uence of a sense of time on human development. Science, 312, 1913–1915.
Chen, S., Emilly, M (2011). Time perspective, death anxiety and emotional regulation processes in older adults (Outstanding Academic Papers by Students (OAPS). Retrieved from City University of Hong Kong, City U Institutional Repository, pp: 11-13. http://hdl.handle.net/2031/6436
Ebrahimi Dinani, G, Hasti & Masti; Interview from Karim Feyz, Tehran: Etla’at, 2011.
Fazeli, M. Nezam-e-Fekri Khayyam; Literary Research: Issue 5, No 20, p 61-89, Summer 2008.
Fooladvand, M. Khayyamshenasi; Tehran, Foroughi, 1969.
Freud, S. (1959). The defense neuro-psychoses. In E. Jones (Ed.), & J. Riviere (Trans.), Collected papers (Vol. 1, pp. 59–75). New York: Basic Books. (Original work published in 1894.)
Fung, H. H.,Carstensen, L. L. (2003). Sending memorable messages to the old: Age differences and memory for emotionally meaningful advertisements. Journal of personality and social psychology, 85,163- 178.
Goharin, S. Asrar Nameh, Tehran:  Zavvar Publication,1959.
Hesampour S. Hassan li, K, Elapsing Time from Khayyam’s Point of View; Journal of Faculty of Humanities and Literature of Tabriz University, 47, p 17-53, Tabriz, Fall 2004.
Hood Jr, R. W., & Morris, R. J. (1983). Toward a theory of death transcendence. Journal for the Scientific study of Religion, 353-365.
Kakaei, Q. Jabareh, N & M, Comparative Study of Thinking about Death from Khayyam and Attar’s Idea; Journal of Religious Thoughts Shiraz University, Issue 14, No 3, p 113-136, Shiraz, Fall 2014.
Khatat, N. Shouhani, A. Effects of Baroque in Khayyam’s Quatrains; Journal of Contemporary Research in World Literature, Issue 11 No33, p 49-64, Tehran, Fall 2006.
Khayyam Neishabouri, Hakim Abolfath, Kahyyam’s Quatrains, with an Introduction by Mohammad ali Foroughi and Qasem Ghani, Edited by Baha aldin Khramshahi, Tehran, Nahid 2002.
Kohandani, M. Khayyam Infidel or Wise; Andisheh Club, http://www.rawzana.com, Spring 2005.
Lennings, C.J. (2000). Optimism, satisfaction and time perspective in the elderly. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 51, 167-181.
Masbough, S.M, Nazari Monazam, H, Farzboud, H. Happines and Seizing the Day in the Thoughts of Khayyam and Tarafa, Textology of Persian Literature, Issue 2, No 1, p 147-162, Spring 2012.
Mirafzali, S.A. Khayyam’s Quatrains in Ancient Resources, Tehran, Center of University Publications, 2003.
Mirzaei, F. Sharifian, M, Parvaneh, A. Khayyam’s Thinking about Death in Works of Two Persian and Arab Poets, Journal of Research in Comparative Language and Literature, Winter 2009.
Murthy, R. S. (Ed.). (2001). The World health report 2001: Mental health: New understanding, new hope . Geneva: World Health Organization.pp:132-141.
Nafisi, M. Four Prospective on Death, Arash Magazine, No 96-97, p 19-27, Fall 2006.
Newberg, A., D’Aquili, E., & Rause, V. (2001). Brain science and the biology of belief: Why God won't go away.112-131.
Nowruzi Davoodkhani, Th. Analyzing the Concepts of Death in the Poetry of Rumi, Khayyam, Sohrab Sepehri and Fereydoon Tvaloli, A Thesis, Faculty of Literature, Tarbiat Modarres University, 2000.
Ortuño, V. E., Paixão, M. P. & Janeiro, I. N. (2013). Adaptação portuguesa da transcendental-future time perspective scale. Avances en Psicología Latinoamericana, vol. 31(2), pp. 376-388.    
Rahmdel, Gh, A Comparison of Seizing the Day between Hafiz and Khayyam; Journal of Adab Pazhouhi: Issue 1, No 2, p 118-141, Gilan, Summer 2006.
Samsam Sh. Seyed Mohammadreza; Kalantari, Mohsen, Psychology of Personality in Khayyam’s prospective; Amin’s Vision in Applied Psychology, Issue 1, No 4, p 1-9, Isfahan, Fall 2014.
Scheibe,S., Carstensen, L. L. (2010). Emotional aging:Recent findings and future trends. Journal of gerontology series B: psychological science & social science, 65B(2), 135-144.
Seema, R., Sircova, A., Baltin, A., & Pork, M. (2014). Transcendental future – Is ithealthy belief or time perspective? Time Perspective Inventory (TTPI) (Boyd Zimbardo, 2006) in Estonians. Oral presentation presented on First International Conference on Time Perspective, Coimbra, Portugal.18(1).57-75.
Shneidman, E. S. (1996). The suicidal mind . New York: Oxford University Press.pp:213-223.
Suddendorf, T. and M. C. Corballis (2007) “The evolution of foresight: what is mental time travel, and is it unique to humans?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30, 299–313.
Tetlock, P. (1989) ‘Accountability: A Social Magnifier of the Dilution Effect’, Journal o f Personality and Social Psychology 57: 388-398.
Urien, B. (2007),Selfless Time From life space to death anticipation.Time & Society copyright .SAGE (Los Angeles, London, New Delhi and Singapore) VOL. 16 No. 2/3                             (2007), pp. 367–386 0961-463X DOI: 10.1177/0961463X07080273.               
Urien, B. and Kilbourne, W. (2007) Generativity and its Relationship to Eco-Friendly Consumption Behaviour. San Diego, CA: American Marketing Association (AMA).pp:354-357.
Van Beek, W. Kairys, A. (2015). Time Perspective and Transcendental Future Thinking. Time Perspective Theory; Review, Research and ApplicationEssays in Honor of Philip G. Zimbardo, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-07368-2_4.73-87.
Yahaghi, M.J, Barati, M.R (Bita), Poyetikes od Death in the Poetry of Sanaei and Khayyam, Anjoman, Year 8, No 21, p 25-50, Tehran, Spring 2006.
Zimbardo, P. (1969) ‘The Human Choice: Individuation, Reason and Order Versus Deindividuation, Impulse and Chaos’, in W.J. Arnold and D. Levine (eds) Nebraska Symposium on Motivation Vol. 17, pp. 237-307. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individualdifferences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77 (6), 1271–1288.
Zimbardo, P., & Boyd, J. (2008). The time paradox: The new psychology of time that will change your life. Simon and Schuster.pp:391.
Zimbardo,P.G., & Boyed,J.N. (1999). Putting Time in Perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1271-1288

Keywords


1- ابراهیمی دینانی، غلامحسین، هستی و مستی؛ گفت وگو از کریم فیض، تهران: اطلاعات،1390.
2- حسام پور، سعید؛ حسن لی، کاووس، «زمان گذران در نگاه بی‌قرار خیام »، نشریه‌ی دانشکده‌ی ادبیات و علوم انسانی دانشگاه تبریز، 47، صص 17-53، تبریز، پاییز1383 .
3- خطاط، نسرین؛ شوهانی، علیرضا، جلوه‌هایی از مکتب باروک در رباعیات خیام. مجله پژوهش ادبیات معاصر جهان: دوره 11شماره33، صص49-64، تهران، پاییز 1385.
4- خیام نیشابوری، حکیم ابوالفتح، رباعیات خیام، با تصحیح دینانیو مقدمه و حواشی محمدعلی فروغی و قاسم غنی، ویراسته‌ی بهاءالدین خرمشاهی، چاپ سوم، تهران: ناهید. 1381.
5- رحمدل، غلامرضا، مقایسه اغتنام فرصت در اندیشه های حافظ و خیام، نشریه ادب پژوهی: دوره1، شماره 2،صص 118 – 141، گیلان، تابستان1385.
6- صمصام شریعت، سید محمد رضا؛ کلانتری، محسن،  روانشناسی شخصیت از دیدگاه عمر خیام نیشابوری، چشم‌انداز امین در روانشناسی کاربردی: دوره 1، شماره 4،صص 1 – 9، اصفهان، پاییز 1393.
7- فاضلی، مهبود، نظام فکری خیام، فصلنامه پژوهش‌های ادبی: فصل 5، شماره 20، صص،61- 89، تابستان1387.
8- فولادوند. محمد مهدی. خیام‌شناسی. تهران: فروغی، 1348.
9- کاکایی، قاسم؛ جباره ناصرو، محبوبه، بررسی تطبیقی مرگاندیشی از دیدگاه خیام و عطار، فصلنامه اندیشه دینی دانشگاه شیراز: دوره 14، شماره 3، صص113- 136، شیراز، پاییز 1393.
10- کهندانی، مهناز،  «خیام کافر یاحکیم»، باشگاه اندیشه، http://www.rawzana.com: بهار 1394.
11- گوهرین، صادق ، اسرارنامه، تهران: انتشارات زوار،1338.
12- مسبوق، سید مهدی؛ نظری منظم، هادی؛ فرزبود، حدیثه، خوشباشی و دم‌غنیمت‌شمری‌ در اندیشه‌های خیام نیشابوری و طَرَفه بن عبد، متن شناسی ادب فارسی: دوره2 شماره 1،صص 147-162، بهار 1391.
13- میر افضلی، سید علی، رباعیات خیام در منابع کهن، تهران: مرکز نشر دانشگاهی، 1382.
14- میرزایی، فرامرز؛ شریفیان، مهدی؛ پروانه، علی، مرگ‌اندیشی خیامی در آثار دو شاعر فارسی و عربی، فصلنامه پژوهش های زبان و ادبیات تطبیقی، دوره 1 شماره 1،صص 159-177، زمستان88.
15- نفیسی، مجید،  چهار نگاه به مرگ. مجله آرش، شماره 96 ـ 97. صص 19 ـ 27، لرستان، پاییز 1385.
16- نوروزی داوودخانی، ثورالله، بررسی و تحلیـل مضـامین مـرگ در شـعر مولوی، خیـام، سهراب سپهری و فریدون تولّلی. پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد رشته زبان و ادبیات فارسی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه تربیت مـدرس تهـران [استاد راهنما حسینعلی قبادی]1379.
17- یاحقی، محمد جعفر؛ براتی، محمد رضا (بی تا)،  بوطیقای مرگ در شعر سنایی و خیام، مجله نامه انجمن: سال 8، شماره 21، صص25 -50، تهران، بهار 1385.
18-Boyd, J. N., & Zimbardo, P. G. (1996). Constructing time after death: The transcendental-future time perspective. Time & Society, 6, 35–54.
19-Boyd, J. N., & Zimbardo, P. G. (1997). Constructing time after death the transcendental-future time perspective. Time & Society, 6(1), 35-54.
20-Boyd, J. N., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2005). Time perspective, health, and risk taking. In A.
21-Carstensen, L. (2006). The infl uence of a sense of time on human development. Science, 312 , 1913–1915.
22-Chen, S., Emilly, M (2011). Time perspective, death anxiety and emotional regulation processes in older adults (Outstanding Academic Papers by Students (OAPS). Retrieved from City University of Hong Kong, City U Institutional Repository, pp: 11-13. http://hdl.handle.net/2031/6436
23-Freud, S. (1959). The defense neuro-psychoses. In E. Jones (Ed.), & J. Riviere (Trans.), Collected papers (Vol. 1, pp. 59–75). New York: Basic Books. (Original work published in 1894.)
24-Fung, H. H.,Carstensen, L. L. (2003). Sending memorable messages to the old: Age differences and memory for emotionally meaningful advertisements. Journal of personality and social psychology, 85,163- 178.
25-Hood Jr, R. W., & Morris, R. J. (1983). Toward a theory of death transcendence. Journal for the Scientific study of Religion, 353-365.
26-Lennings, C.J. (2000). Optimism, satisfaction and time perspective in the elderly. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 51, 167-181.
27-Murthy, R. S. (Ed.). (2001). The World health report 2001: Mental health: New understanding, new hope . Geneva: World Health Organization.pp:132-141.
Newberg, A., D’Aquili, E., & Rause, V. (2001). Brain science and the biology of belief: Why God won't go away.112-131.
29-Ortuño, V. E., Paixão, M. P. & Janeiro, I. N. (2013). Adaptação -portuguesa da transcendental-future time perspective scale. Avances en Psicología Latinoamericana, vol. 31(2), pp. 376-388.    
30-Scheibe,S., Carstensen, L. L. (2010). Emotional aging:Recent findings and future trends. Journal of gerontology series B: psychological science & social science, 65B(2), 135-144.
31-Seema, R., Sircova, A., Baltin, A., & Pork, M. (2014). Transcendental future – Is ithealthy belief or time perspective? Time Perspective Inventory (TTPI) (Boyd Zimbardo, 2006) in Estonians. Oral presentation presented on First International Conference on Time Perspective, Coimbra, Portugal.18(1).57-75.
32-Shneidman, E. S. (1996). The suicidal mind . New York: Oxford University Press.pp:213-223.
33-Suddendorf, T. and M. C. Corballis (2007) “The evolution of foresight: what is mental time travel, and is it unique to humans?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30, 299–313.
34-Tetlock, P. (1989) ‘Accountability: A Social Magnifier of the Dilution Effect’, Journal o f Personality and Social Psychology 57: 388-398.
35-Urien, B. (2007), Selfless Time From life space to death anticipation. Time & Society copyright .SAGE (Los Angeles, London, New Delhi and Singapore) VOL. 16 No. 2/3  (2007), pp. 367–386 0961-463X DOI: 10.1177/0961463X07080273.              
36-Urien, B. and Kilbourne, W. (2007) Generativity and its Relationship to Eco-Friendly Consumption Behaviour. San Diego, CA: American Marketing Association (AMA).pp:354-357.
37-Van Beek, W. Kairys, A. (2015). Time Perspective and Transcendental Future Thinking. Time Perspective Theory; Review, Research and ApplicationEssays in Honor of Philip G. Zimbardo, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-07368-2_4.73-87.
38-Zimbardo, P. (1969) ‘The Human Choice: Individuation, Reason and Order Versus Deindividuation, Impulse and Chaos’, in W.J. Arnold and D. Levine (eds) Nebraska Symposium on Motivation Vol. 17, pp. 237-307. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
39-Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individualdifferences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77 (6), 1271–1288.
40-Zimbardo, P., & Boyd, J. (2008). The time paradox: The new psychology of time that will change your life. Simon and Schuster.pp:391.
41-Zimbardo,P.G., & Boyed,J.N. (1999). Putting Time in Perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1271-1288