مدح، سنتی رایج در میان شاعران فارسیزبان و ازجمله راههای امرار معاش بودهاست. انوری در کنار قصاید مدحی، قطعههای تقاضای گاه حقیرانه و درعینحال زیبایی نیز سرودهاست. بهدلیل این تقاضاها از میان صدها شاعر، بعضی از پژوهشگران فقط او را متکدّی دانستهاند. برای معلومکردن صحّت و سقم این نسبت، تقاضاهای برخی از شاعران را بررسی کردهایم و مشخص شد عواملی چون: عدمامنیّت شغلی، دشواری شرایط شاعرشدن، امساک ممدوحان از دادن صله، احتیاج شاعران و اهمیّت مدح برای ممدوحان باعث شدهاست مدیحهسرایی و بهتبع آن تقاضاسرایی هرروز رایجتر شود. بیثباتی موقعیّت سیاسی از دورۀ سنجر و برکیارقبنملکشاه و ازدسترفتن ثبات شغلی و درآمد شاعران، سبب شده تا آنها در این برهه از تاریخ نسبتبه دورههای قبل تقاضای چیزهای کمبهاتر کنند. همچنین دریافتیم که اشعاری از انوری که تکدّی خوانده شده، مشابهات زیادی در دیوانهای شاعران دیگر دارد؛ ازاینرو دادن عنوان تکدیگری تنها به انوری عادلانه نیست. موارد زیر را میتوان عاملِ دادن این نسبت به انوری دانست: اقرار انوری به اینکه «گدایی شریعت شُعراست» و معروفشدن او بهعنوان یکی از سه پیغمبر شعر باعث شده محقّقانی که او را در این پایه نمیدیدند، عیبهایش را بیشتر آشکار کنند.
عنوان مقاله [English]
The demand for livelihoods in the poetry of praise poets is based on the ratio of the individual to Anvari
Persian poets and it has been one of the main ways of earning livelihood for them . AnvariEulogizing people in power has been a common tradition among ancient Abivardi is one of these poets that besides his demand odes he also composedbeautiful but sometimes belittling verses and this has been a reason for some researchers toconsider him among hundreds of poets as a beggarly person. Inorder to verify this accusation in current study the demands of some poets have been investigated. Analysisof these poets' demands showed that factors such as lack of jobsecurity, vissicitudes of time, difficulties on the way of becoming a poet, refusing some of praised people togive rewards, needs of poets and especialimportance of poets' praise for the praised ones caused eulogizing and composing demandingpoetry became more common on that era. Instability of political position of ministers andgovernment's men from Barkiaragh- ben Malekshah and king Sanjer era onwards and instability of poets'jobshad caused demands of this era to be trivial in comparison with previous time. Withinvestigating demands of above-mentioned poets it bacame clear that there are many versesin these poets' divans that are similar with Anvari's poems, so only accusing Anvari as abegger is not fair. It can be said that Anvari's confession in his words such as ''beggary is thereligion of poetry'' and some of his words that he considered himself as ''like us a bunch ofbeggar'' and his popularity as one of three harbingers of Persian poetry which stimulatedthose researchers who did not consider him as a superior poet trying to show his faults are. among the most important reasons for this vindication.
In persian literature many poets eulogized kings, commanders, agents and accountants and they expected to recieve reward for their livelihood. Due to this, there is a section in persian literature entitled demands. Among poets of persian literature there were poets who did not belittle themselves for meeting their daily needs in this way, but if we compare the life conditions of these poets and their life situations with each other we will percieve that most of times they were inevitable to behave in such a way and also comparing people from moral point of view is correct when they have the same conditions. So, it is not correct to attribute beggary to these poets and it is not a fair judgement..
Anvari is among those poets that researchers consider him as an excellent poet. However, from moral point of view some of contemporary literati with dismissing historical, social and cultural situations and Anvari's personal life conditions have called him a beggar.
In this research demand poems of poets such as Rudaki, Onsori, Farokhi, Manoochehri, Masood Sad, Ghataran Tabrizi, Moazi, Sanaie, Amaghe Bokhari, Adib Saber, Osman Mokhtari, Abdolvase Jabali, Ghavami Razi, Osman Mokhtari, Soozani Samarghandi, Asir Akhsitki, Jamal Al din Abdorrazagh Esfehani, Khaghani, Bilghani, Rashid Vatvat, Zahir Faryabi and Kamal Al din Esfehani are investigated to understand that whether the accusation of beggary attributed to Anvari by many researchers of persian litrature is right or wrong and also we investigate the development of material demands of poets and the causes of such demand poems.
2- Research methodology
Firstly, related versus and causes of composing demand poems were extracted and then through analytical- discriptive method the reseach questions were answered.
Maazi as the poet laureate of Saljugh era demanded horse tent, horse, camel, silver cup, incense, amber, musk, last year prize, Turkish beautiful woman and sumptuous cloth. In his poems he explicitly demanded rewards and prizes. The development of demands from Samanid to Saljugh era can be observed through comparing demands of Rudaki, Onsori and Mazi as three distinguished poet laureates. Not only in the poems of Mazi( as the poet of Saljugh era) but also in the poems of other poets from this era trifle goods are demanded, for example Sanaie demanded rice, bread,fruits, prize, money( Derham), silver. Osman Mokhtari also demanded bread, cloth, wine, gold, prize, loan and silver. Abdolvase Jebeli also demanded wine, cloth, house, and loan. Another poet Ghavami Razi demanded bread, meat, mistress, horse, prize, price of turbun, saddle and cloth. The last poet is Asir Akhsitki who demanded straw and barely for his horse, meat, camel, wine, horse, paper, money ( Dinar), silk cloth and robe.
Anvari can not be vindicated from beggary accusation, but as it can be seen in most poets' Divans that we investigated including Rudaki, Manoochehri, Farokhi, Onsori, Masoud Sad Salman, Sanaie, Zahir Faryabi, Rashid Al din Vatvat, Jamal Al din Esfehani, Osman Mokhtari, Soozani Samarghandi, Kamal Al din Ismaeil Esfehani, Mojir Al din Bilaghani, Abdolvase Jebali, Ghataran Tabrizi, Moazi,Khaghani, Asir Akhsitki and Ghavam Tabrizi, there are explicit and implicit demands. Almost all the trifle demands that Anvari due to those was accused exist in poems of pre- Anvari poets and especially in poems of those who lived in Anvari's period. Persian language demands transformed gradually. In Samanid era in which eulogies were normal and far from exaggeration the poets demanded more generosity and the goods did not include trifle things and they were expressed indirectly. In Ghaznavi era praising odes were more exaggerated and demands were expressed more direct and explicit and gradually trifle demands were penetrated poems. In Saljuk era in which praising odes reached its climax and the praised people were portrayed in full exaggeration, it seemed that others did not deserve those odes and they did not understand the value of poets and in result demands of poets were expressed more explicitly in comparison to prior eras and they included other trifle goods, too.
Reasons such as lack of job's security and lack of income sources and special importance of poets' praising for people in power led poets to compose demand and praising poems.
Instability of political situation of ministers and governmental agents led them to pay more attention to their power position and they did not have necessary time and composure for other poets. In addition, the poets had to praise two rivals simultaneously and this made the praised ones annoyed and they did not give expensive rewards and this caused many poets were satisfied even with trifle demands.
Finally, at the end of this research it can be mentioned that it is not correct to consider Anvari a beggar, because it is a historical fact that demand poetry was a common issue among all persian poets and it was ont restricted to Anvari.
The difference among Anvari's demand poems and other poets' was due to political, social and cultural condition of that period. Perhaps one of the reasons that caused that some of contemporary researchers consider Anvari as a beggar is that in past some people such as Hatefi Jami and Azar Bigdeli considered him as one of the three pinnacles of persian poetry and positioned him beside great poets such as Ferdowsi and Saadi and dismissed poets such as Mowlavi, Hafez, Sanaie , etc. It should be noted that Anvari like Sanaie at last put the demand poetry aside and he considerd it as begging and he composed poems in praising needlessness which are unique in persian litrature.
1. Adib Saber, Sh, Divan adib saber termezi, Ghavami, A( Ed), Tehran: Khavar, 1331.
2. Akhsikati, A, Divan asir akhsikati, Homayoon Farokh, R ( Ed), Tehran: Roodaki, 1347.
3. .Amagh Bokhari, Sh, Divan ashar amagh bokhari, Nafisi,S(Ed), Tehran: Foroughi Lib, no Date.
4. Anvari Abivardi, A, Divan anvari. Nafisi, S ( Ed), Tehran: Pirooz, 1337.
5.Azar bigdeli, Lotfali Beig, Atashkadeye azar, Naseri, H( Ed), Tehran: Heidari Printing Office, 1336.
6. Babasafari,A., & Farahnak,Z, Investigating and analyzing demands in Kamal-Al-Din Isfahani Poems, Persian Literature and Language Quarterly. 4(11), 40-68, 1388.
7. Bilaghani, M, Divan mojirodin bilaghani, Abadi, M( Ed). Tabriz: The publication of Institute of Iran's Culture and History, 1358.
8. Brown, E, Tarikh adabi iran az Ferdowsi ta Saadi, ( Saleh, A, Trans.). Tehran : Amir Kabir, 1358.
9. Carla,K, Divansalari dar ahde sljoghi,Y(Trans), Tehran: Amir Kabir, 1363.
10. Farokhi Sistani, A, Divan farokhi sistani, Tehran: Zavvar, 1363.
11. Faryabi, Z, Divan zahir faryabi, Binesh, T(Ed), Tehran: Bastan, 1337.
12. Foruzanfar,B, Sokhan va sokhanvaran, Tehran: Zovvar, 1387.
13. Ghataran Tabrizi,A, Divan ghatran tabrizi, Nakhjavani, M(Ed), Tabriz: Shafagh, 1333.
14. Ghavami Razi,B, divan ghavami razi, Hosseini, M(Ed),Tehran: Sepehr, 1334.
15. Homaie,J, tarikh adabiyat iran, Tehran: Homa, 1375.
16. Isfahani, J, Divan kamel ostad jamalodin abdolrazagh isfahani, H( Ed).Tehran: Sanaei Library Publication, 1362.
17. Jami, A, Baharestan. Sharifi, M( Ed), Tehran: Markazi Library, 1311.
18. Jebeli, A, Divan abdol vase jebeli, Safa, Z( Ed). Tehran: Amir Kabir, 1361.
19. Kamal Al Din Isfahani,E, Divan khalagholmaani abolfazl kamalodin ismail isfahani, Bahrol Olumi, H, Tehran: Dehkhoda, 1348.
20. Khaghani, A, Divan afzalodin badil ebn ali najar khaghani shervani, Sajadi, Z( Ed), Tehran: Zavvar Publication, 1373.
21. Manuchehri,A, divan manuchehri damghani, Dabir Siaghi, M. Tehran: Zovvar, 1356.
22.Moazi,M, divan ashare moazi, Hiri,N(Ed),Tehran: Marzban, 1362.
23. mokhtari, os,M, divan osman mokhtari. Homaei,J(Ed), Tehran: Translation and Distribution of Books Publication, 1341.
24. Nafisi,S, mohid va zendgi va ahval va ashare rudaki, Tehran: Ibn Sina, 1341.
25. Onsori,A, Divan ostad onsori balkhi, Dabir Siagh,M(Ed), Tehran: Sanaie Lib, 1342.
26. Ravandi, M, Rahatolsodur , ayatosorur dar tarikh al saljogh,M(Ed), Tehran: Asatir Publication, 1386.
27. Saad In Salman, M, Davin masud saad salman, Yasemi, R(Ed), Tehran: Amir Kabir, 1362.
28. Saboor,D, Afagh ghazal farsi, Tehran: Zavvar, 1384.
29. Safa,Z, Tarikh adabiyat iran, Tehran: Ferdows Publication, 1369.
30. Sanaie,A. divan hakim abulmajd majdud ebn adame sanai gaznavi, Razavi,M(Ed), Tehran: Sanaie Library Publication, Bita
31. Shafiee Kadkani,M, Mofles kimiya forush, Tehran: Sokhan, 1389.
32. Shiri,Gh, Ebhame faryade natamam, Hamedan: Bu Ali University Publication, 1391.
33. Soozani Samarghandi, M, Divan hakim soozani samarghandi, Shah Hosseini,N(Ed), Tehran: Sepehr Publication, 1344.
34. Vatvat, R, Divan rashidodin vatvat. Nafisi, S(Ed), Tehran: Shah Abad, 1339.
35. Yusefi, Gh, Cheshmeye rowshan: didari ba shaeran, Tehran: Elmi, 1369.
36. Zarinkoob,A, Ba karevan holle, Tehran: Elmi publication, 1372.